Andriy Baygerych / professional profile

Founder-operator and applied AI systems engineer.

I design, operate, audit, and progressively govern machine systems under real constraints. My strongest work is at the boundary between model capability and host-owned reality: accepted context, tools, writable surfaces, independent verification, retained failure memory, and authority.

Plain-text CV profile.json

Professional summary

I make complex AI systems answerable to evidence.

Independent founder-operator of IFP/SAGE, a local-first governed evidence and learning substrate. I coordinate high-compute AI workers for repository archaeology, diagnosis, implementation, and adversarial review while preserving a host-owned separation between worker output, verified facts, retained learning, resource use, and authority.

Non-traditional path. I do not claim a formal IT engineering diploma. I present live systems, exact artifacts, bounded results, and the defects found in my own work.

Core capabilities

Applied AI systems architecture

Provider-neutral worker boundaries, local sovereignty, modular control planes, and explicit state-to-outcome loops.

Live-system re-derivation

Runtime identity, service topology, writer/reader/consumer graphs, stale-document correction, and evidence status.

AI evals and closure

Distinguishing execution, use, changed later behavior, verified improvement, and cross-provider transfer.

Governance engineering

Admission boundaries, capability envelopes, authority containment, rollback, refusal, and append-only correction.

Technical programme direction

Scope locks, stop conditions, worker-role separation, artifact review, independent challenge, and staged authorization.

Machine-readable truth surfaces

Human and machine documentation, claim-state vocabularies, structured data, public verification paths, and honest nulls.

Selected work

  1. Machine Governor P0-RL

    Re-derived 35 learning/control mechanisms, separated internal learning from worker-steering learning, and reduced the missing delta to a deterministic steering consumer over Track-2, G1, and KAS. Primary result provisional; artifact review pending.

  2. DecisionBundleV1 P1 evidence rebuild

    Qualified an exact-SHA candidate with 315 passing clean-worktree tests. The verifier established package internal consistency and refused the unsupported broader-record claim.

  3. OVL paid attestation rail

    Closed a self-paid Base Sepolia testnet issuance with x402 settlement, Ed25519 signing, independent content-hash re-derivation, hash-chain correlation, and four tamper rejections.

  4. Track-2 generalized closure ledger

    Directed the reduction of agent invocation, governance admission, closure event, and substrate consumption into append-only records with runtime hooks and explicit authority separation.

  5. Governed knowledge and experiment isolation

    Developed the architectural path for admitting machine proposals, holding them in non-authoritative lanes, replay-checking them, and isolating experimentation from production learning.

Operating principles

  • A worker's completion report is a claim, not programme closure.
  • Historical documents are evidence inputs, not current runtime truth.
  • A stored memory is not learning until it changes a later attempt.
  • Changed behavior is not improvement until a held-out result verifies it.
  • Improvement does not grant authority.
  • Negative and undecidable results remain first-class records.
  • The best architecture is often the smallest one that closes the actual loop.

Role fit

Where I am most useful.

Forward-deployed AI engineering

Embedding advanced models into messy customer or operator environments and carrying the work through to a checkable outcome.

Agent systems and infrastructure

Context, tools, capability boundaries, memory, retries, verification, closure, and provider-neutral control.

AI evaluations and reliability

Adversarial testing, failure attribution, honest baselines, tamper detection, and downstream-effect verification.

Applied AI architecture and technical product

Turning a difficult operational problem into a bounded system, evidence model, delivery plan, and operator-visible surface.